Collect creatures.
Win with physics.
Quanta Quest is a monster-collecting battler with 151 creatures across 51 evolution lines. There’s no button-mashing — you land every hit by solving the real physics and math behind your attacks.
Catch, solve, evolve
Catch your team
Explore the overworld, weaken a wild creature in battle, then throw a Vector Ball — but only a correct answer seals the capture.
Battle with physics & math
Pick a move and solve its problem — kinetic energy, Ohm's law, a Punnett square. Answer right to land the hit, fast for a critical; miss and your attack fizzles while the enemy strikes back.
Evolve & fill the codex
Correct answers charge your DATA gauge — at 100% you COMPILE from Rookie to Champion to Ultimate mid-battle. Earn gym badges and track every species in the Creature Atlas.
A real game, and a real curriculum
151 creatures, 11 types
A roster of 151 creatures across 51 three-stage evolution lines, spanning 11 elemental types from Kinetic and Volt to Bio and Quanta — and every type matchup is justified by a real physical reason, not a random chart.
Win by knowing the science
60 real physics, math, and biology formulas, each with randomized numbers and a worked explanation. Get the answer, land the hit — evolved forms wield harder equations, and Ultimates chain two-step problems.
A full adventure
Explore a tile overworld, beat gym leaders for badges, capture and store a team, spend data shards in the shop, and follow the 8-chapter Moonflower storyline.
60 real formulas, hidden inside the fun
Every move maps to a genuine equation — with randomized numbers and a worked solution each time — across mechanics, electricity, thermodynamics, waves, genetics, and discrete math. Pitched at intro high-school (KS3–GCSE) level.
Built on how people learn
Quanta Quest’s design follows well-established findings from education research. These studies describe the principles the game is built on — active problem-solving, retrieval practice, and game-based engagement. They are evidence for the approach, not efficacy claims about this specific game.
Actively solving problems beats passively watching. A meta-analysis of 225 studies found active learning raised STEM exam performance and left students about 1.5× less likely to fail than traditional lecturing.
Freeman et al., PNAS (2014) ↗Answering to attack is retrieval practice — repeatedly pulling an answer from memory improves long-term retention far more than simply re-reading it.
Roediger & Karpicke, Psychological Science (2006) ↗In physics specifically, interactive-engagement courses roughly doubled students' conceptual gains on the Force Concept Inventory compared with traditional lecture.
Hake, American Journal of Physics (1998) ↗Across controlled studies, well-designed digital games significantly improved learning versus non-game instruction (g = 0.33).
Clark, Tanner-Smith & Killingsworth, Review of Educational Research (2016) ↗
Ready to catch your first creature?
Start free as a guest, or create an account to save your team, badges, and codex across devices.